2020-07-08 conda-forge core meeting
Attendees
- Jonathan Helmus
 - Marius van Niekerk
 - Filipe Fernandes
 - Matthew Becker
 - Keith Kraus
 - CJ Wright
 - Cheng Lee
 - Wolf Vollprecht
 - Eric Dill
 - Uwe Korn
 - Marcel Bargull
 - Anthony Scopatz
 - John Kirkham
 - Isuru Fernando
 - Lori Burns
 - Marcelo Trevisani
 
Agenda
Your agenda items
- 
(CJ) budget, also finance subteam creation
 - 
intros for new folks on the call
 - 
(FF) Open Force Field request to NumFOCUS
- Likely looking to engage in a contract relationship, Anthony interested
 - We could create a list of "suggested" companies/persons who do this type of work
 - Where should we land this information on the website?
- conda-forge.org/commercial
 - conda-forge.org/
 
 
 - 
(FF) Should we do Outreachy as part of an effort to support diversity in tech? Advantages are low cost and high impact. Disadvantages are the time effort from the mentors.
 - 
(ED) Did we need to document anything from the CUDA 11 stuff that Keith brought up last time? No.
-  (KK) CUDA 11 support
- CUDA 11 dropped CentOS 6 support
 - ties into CentOS 7 migration above
 cudatoolkit11 - https://github.com/AnacondaRecipes/cudatoolkit-feedstock/pull/7- Make sure we have a glibc run constrain line TODO: Jonathan will review this PR
 
- Add Docker image (need to double check how 
FROMcan be adjusted conditionally)- Needs a recent docker version but this should work
ARG IMAGE=ubuntu:latest
FROM ${IMAGE} 
 - Needs a recent docker version but this should work
 
 
 -  (KK) CUDA 11 support
 - 
(KK) CUDA Toolkit in conda-forge update
- With a few changes to the recipe conda-forge will be able to build+distribute cudatoolkit
 - TODO: Eric will get the NVBug link from Keith and archive it in the conda-forge google drive.
 - TODO: John K. will update the cuda toolkit feedstock on the git repo to note the NVBug link to the internal NVIDIA issue tracker
 - TODO: Jonathan will update docs to note that some non-exhaustive list of packages (like cuda-toolkit, MKL, etc.)
 
 - 
(IF) strict channel priority
- Needed for PyPy
 - Needed for Cos7
 - Remove packages that we don't fully support. For eg: there are 3 builds of scipy on windows.
 - Older versions of tensorflow?
 - Could make strict a option in conda_forge.yaml
 
 - 
Discussion of "hard to build packages"
- rstudio (redist may be somewhat sketchy?)
 - tensorflow
 - qt
 - scipy on Windows
 - Should we publish a list and ask for help on those?
 
 - 
(UK) CFEP-18, please vote
- https://github.com/conda-forge/cfep/pull/34
 - voting passed!
 
 - 
(UK) Voting Fatigue
- discussed various alternatives
 - sub-teams
 
 - 
(UK) "GPL-free" variants
- Some packages like Python, sqlite have a dependency on libreadline which is GPL licensed. There might be arguments that this doesn't trickle up the stack but Corporate Compliance/IT have a different stance on that.
 - Similar issues with other packages where the GPL-dependency is quite often an optional one.
 - We probably want to have that functionality enabled by default but provide an alternative variant without GPL dependencies.
 
 - 
(CL) msys2 packages
- Anaconda deciding on update plans for "defaults" channel
 
 
Active votes
Subteam updates
Bot
- (CJ) Status of openjdk, r-java stalled out
 
Stuff from last week that we didn't get to
ARM
POWER
CUDA
Docs
staged-recipes
website
security+systems
- still need to finish CFEP-13 (can move ahead now that latest smithy is out)
 
CI infrastructure
Compiler upgrade
CFEP updates
Open PRs
- 
cfep-04 X11 and CDT policy
- INACTIVE - Merge in with some inactive-esque status?
 - Needs new champion. Thanks for your work on this pkgw! Has unaddressed comments from pkgw as from Jan 10, 2020
 
 - 
cfep-06 Staged-recipes review lifecycle
- INACTIVE - Merge in with some inactive-esque status?
 - Lingering comment from @saraedum. @jakirkham, can you reply? Has unadressed comment from @saraedum from Jan 8, 2020
 - (MRB) The stalebot has solved the worst of the issues here. I think we could defer this one permanently.
 
 - 
cfep-10 Feedstock statuses, unmaintained
- INACTIVE - Merge in with some inactive-esque status?
 - Needs another review. Has unaddressed updates from pkgw as of Jan 11, 2020
 
 - 
cfep-12 Removing packages that violate the terms of the source package
- Stalled since May 26, 2020
 - Active debate about moving to "broken" vs deleting from conda-forge channel
 - Active vote, ends on 2020-03-11
 - What were the results of the vote?
 - Did we hear back from NumFOCUS?
 
 - 
cfep-17 Handling pin backports and dependency rebuilds
- Stalled debate about implementation details between Isuru, CJ and Matt
 
 
Discussion
Check in on previous action items
Copy previous action items from last meeting agenda.
This meeting
- Eric will get the NVBug link from Keith and archive it in the conda-forge google drive.
 - Eric to add a new page to our docs around how to engage with conda-forge and affiliated in a commercial relationship.
 - John K. will update the cuda toolkit feedstock on the git repo to note the NVBug link to the internal NVIDIA issue tracker
 - Jonathan will update docs to note that some non-exhaustive list of packages (like cuda-toolkit, MKL, etc.)
 - Jonathan will review this PR
 
Last meeting
2 meetings ago
3 meetings ago
- (CJ) Form finance subteam
 - (ED) document strategies for reproducible environments using conda-forge
 -  (ED) Add conda-forge page about commercial engagements
- Create a list of "suggested" companies/persons who do external companies can engage with for custom work
 
 -  (UK) Static libraries stuff
- Add linting hints to builds to find them
 - Recommend how to package them -> CFEP-18
 - We should write docs saying we don't provide support and this is a bad idea. -> CFEP-18
 
 
Move to Issue Tracker
- (Kale) schedule conda working group
 - cfep-10 next steps: CJ to call a vote for feedback
 - cfep-06 next steps: Ask staged recipes team to champion this CFEP and move it forward
 - jakirkham & CJ-wright to sync on adding CUDA to the migration bot
 -  (Eric) Scheduling Anaconda <-> conda-forge sync on anaconda.org requirements gathering
- Will try and get this scheduled in the next month.
 
 - (Anthony) Reach out to NumFocus to figure out legal ramifications of not including licenses in files.
 - (Eric) check internally for funding levels for hotels & flying folks from the community in?
 - (Eric) Figure out finances of conda-forge to support themselves?
 - (jjhelmus) Open up CFEP for which python's we're going to support
 - (jakirkham) write a blog post on CUDA stuff we discussed today
 - (jakirkham) update docs on how to add CUDA support to feedstocks
 - (jakirkham) will open an issue on conda-smithy to investigate Drone issues. (ping the aarch team)
 -  (ED) Who we are page? Some combination of a FAQ and a who is everyone. FAQ things like:
- who's the POC for CF <> Anaconda, CF <> NumFocus, CF <> Azure
 - who's the POC for the various subteams?
 - Informal information: roles, day jobs, bios, the whole nine yards, why you're here, etc.
 - Public or internal? I don't really care either way. Anyone feel strongly one way or the other?
 - opt-in to public bios
 - software carpentry has a large number of instructors and has https://carpentries.org/instructors
 - some concern about "yet another place to keep stuff up to date"