2020-12-16 conda-forge core meeting
Zoom link What time is the meeting in my time zone last weeks meeting
Attendees
Agenda
Standing items
- 
intros for new folks on the call
- Matti - numpy core dev + pypi core dev
 
 - 
(CJ) budget
- current approvals?
 - Whenever updated numbers land, please screenshare and show the budget.
- Link is in Keybase (numfocus_spreadsheets.txt)
 
 - (CJ) We're all up to date and Oct P&L is zero
 
 - 
open votes
 - 
(MRB/ED/SC) Roadmap / Funding
- Kicked out to separate meeting
 
 
From previous meeting(s)
Your new() agenda items
- 
(CJ) Pangeo-forge usage of the conda-forge logo
- https://github.com/pangeo-forge/roadmap
 - https://github.com/pangeo-forge/roadmap/blob/master/pangeo-forge-logo-blue.png?raw=true
 - Next steps: CJ to send email to pangeo by EOD thursday?
- Letter text https://hackmd.io/a-UbkYx4TJanVL00dMFWZw
 
 
 - 
(MRB) Legal advice for third-party artifacts and uploads
- We have an offer from numfocus to get legal advice on third-party artifact hosting and uploads.
 - What are the issues we'd like to ask?
- What terms of service do we need to have in place in order to process (download, validate, copy them), upload to third-parties (github, anaconda), and possibly serve artifacts (quetz)?
 - How do we ensure our users have properly agreed to those terms of service?
- Does this encompass the cuda-toolkit issue?
 
 - What do we do about DMCA take-downs and the like for servers we control?
 
 - covers built sources and built artifacts
 - who takes responsibility for (source) license violations?
 - who is liable if someone uses our infrastructure to upload illegal content to anaconda.org?
- e.g. intellectual property
 - or even really bad stuff that have nothing to do with software.
 
 - what changes if we operate a conda-forge Quetz server?
 - what about feedstock maintainer liability? What about with auto-merge?
 - what contracts, if any, must be in place with service providers (e.g., GitHub, Anaconda)?
 - google analytics and GDPR. -> chris to ask Phil
 - Todo
- Chris ask Phil on google analytics - removed anyways
 - Matt to respond to numfocus
 
 
 - 
(FF) Announcement: Small Grant Developed for conda messaging got funded by NumFOCUS
 - 
(IF) PyPy3.7 migration
- discuss specifics of migration implemetation (adding pypy3.7 or pypy3.6+pypy3.7) in future bot meeting/bot issues
 
 - 
(IF) Build and upload msys2 packages
- https://github.com/conda-forge/msys2-recipes/issues/1
 - Add strict channel priority on windows
 
 - 
(IF) End boost migration?
- send a PR
 
 - 
(IF) Need linux-64 machine with docker support to build pytorch packages
- Sylvain: we can create one on OVH I think.
 
 - 
(WV) (Will do this via blog post and next meeting) Quick Update on the current state of Quetz / beta.mamba.pm
 - 
(MB) Migrate to numpy=1.17.*,>=1.17.5
 - 
(MB) CentOS 7 update: Will open a draft announcement PR, maybe not moving as fast because of earlier COS8 EOL
- pull the switch sometime in Q1 next year
 - MRB: make an announcement
 - MRB: bump bioconda and gitter
 
 - 
(ED) (low importance, should be last if we have time) Thoughts around CFEPs? We have 7 open PRs, all are stalled.
 
Pushed to next meeting
Active votes
Subteam updates
Bot
ARM
POWER
CUDA
Docs
staged-recipes
website
security+systems
CI infrastructure
Compiler upgrade
CFEP updates
Open PRs
- 
cfep-04 X11 and CDT policy
- INACTIVE - Merge in with some inactive-esque status?
 - Needs new champion. Thanks for your work on this pkgw! Has unaddressed comments from pkgw as from Jan 10, 2020
 
 - 
cfep-06 Staged-recipes review lifecycle
- INACTIVE - Merge in with some inactive-esque status?
 - Lingering comment from @saraedum. @jakirkham, can you reply? Has unadressed comment from @saraedum from Jan 8, 2020
 - (MRB) The stalebot has solved the worst of the issues here. I think we could defer this one permanently.
 
 - 
cfep-10 Feedstock statuses, unmaintained
- INACTIVE - Merge in with some inactive-esque status?
 - Needs another review. Has unaddressed updates from pkgw as of Jan 11, 2020
 
 - 
cfep-12 Removing packages that violate the terms of the source package
- Stalled since May 26, 2020
 - Active debate about moving to "broken" vs deleting from conda-forge channel
 - Active vote, ends on 2020-03-11
 - What were the results of the vote?
 - Did we hear back from NumFOCUS?
 
 - 
cfep-17 Handling pin backports and dependency rebuilds
- Stalled debate about implementation details between Isuru, CJ and Matt
 - UPDATE 2020-07-22: We in principle have agreement to render the extra pinnings needed directly in the feedstock on a temporary basis (i.e., until the migration has ended).
 
 - 
cfep-19 Pinning epochs
- Stalled since July
 
 - 
cfep-20 Package split
- No updates for ~1 month
 
 
Discussion
Check in on previous action items
Copy previous action items from last meeting agenda.
This meeting
2020-11-24
Last meeting
2020-11-18
-  (IF/MRB/MV) intel oneAPI
- todo
- (Nikolay) licensing for opencl_rt
 - (Nikolay) intelmpi ABI compat w/ mpich
 - (MRB/IF) figure out how exactly to package C/C++ compilers
 - (MRB/IF) think about fortran ABI
 - (MRB) make conda-forge compilers room (add people including keith)
 
 
 - todo
 -  (MB) asking core members to move to "emeritus" status
-  TODO: Eric to set up quarterly check-in for all core members to see if they're interested in remaining "active" or if they want to move to emeritus
- Remove emeritus folks from having access to various credentials (api tokens, twitter password, etc.)? This would require a change to the governance doc.
 
 
 -  TODO: Eric to set up quarterly check-in for all core members to see if they're interested in remaining "active" or if they want to move to emeritus
 
2 meetings ago
2020-11-11
- TODO: Think about bringing in JOSS to provide context around how we might best write papers
 
Move to Issue Tracker
2020-11-03
- TODO: Check on Forrest Watters permissions for core
 -  (FF) Outreachy would cost 6500 USD.
- Next steps: write abstract and vote on spending of funds.
 
 
2020-10-28 2020-10-21
-  (Marius?) Python 2.7 migration
- ( ) [ ] make a hint
 - ( ) [ ] make an announcement
 - ( ) [ ] make the hint a lint
 
 
2020-10-07
- Make sure to add the NVBug info to the cudatoolkit package that conda-forge makes (if we make one)
 
2020-09-09
- (ED) Update governance docs with similar voting model as what got put into conda-tools (+3 with no -1 is a pass)
 - (SC) Write jinja template to turn institutional partners yaml into a website https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge.github.io/blob/2a2d3caaf7d74eb370ac40c679ba337a73d15c8a/src/inst_partners.yaml
 - (SC) Document what needs to be done to create an OVH account and get access
 
2020-08-26 Docker hub
- (JK) Check in on Azure build workers to see if they have the docker hub limitation.
 -  (JK) work with dockerhub to see if we can get OSS status
- Check in again at some point. We haven't heard back as of 2020-09-23
 
 
OVH
- 
Shout-out on twitter at some point. "Thanks forOVHCloud for providing a VM", etc. (maybe after we ship qt on windows with it?)
 - 
Figure out how to communicate breaking changes to users. Likely should open up an issue immediately for futher discussion. Ping @kkraus, plus capture notes from further up in these meeting notes
 - 
John K. will update the cuda toolkit feedstock on the git repo to note the NVBug link to the internal NVIDIA issue tracker
 - 
Jonathan will update docs to note that some non-exhaustive list of packages (like cuda-toolkit, MKL, etc.)
 - 
Jonathan will review this PR
 - 
(Kale) schedule conda working group
 - 
cfep-10 next steps: CJ to call a vote for feedback
 - 
cfep-06 next steps: Ask staged recipes team to champion this CFEP and move it forward
 - 
jakirkham & CJ-wright to sync on adding CUDA to the migration bot
 - 
(Eric) Scheduling Anaconda <-> conda-forge sync on anaconda.org requirements gathering
- Will try and get this scheduled in the next month.
 
 - 
(Anthony) Reach out to NumFocus to figure out legal ramifications of not including licenses in files.
 - 
(Eric) check internally for funding levels for hotels & flying folks from the community in?
 - 
(Eric) Figure out finances of conda-forge to support themselves?
 - 
(jjhelmus) Open up CFEP for which python's we're going to support
 - 
(jakirkham) write a blog post on CUDA stuff we discussed today
 - 
(jakirkham) update docs on how to add CUDA support to feedstocks
 - 
(jakirkham) will open an issue on conda-smithy to investigate Drone issues. (ping the aarch team)
 - 
(ED) Who we are page? Some combination of a FAQ and a who is everyone. FAQ things like:
- who's the POC for CF <> Anaconda, CF <> NumFocus, CF <> Azure
 - who's the POC for the various subteams?
 - Informal information: roles, day jobs, bios, the whole nine yards, why you're here, etc.
 - Public or internal? I don't really care either way. Anyone feel strongly one way or the other?
 - opt-in to public bios
 - software carpentry has a large number of instructors and has https://carpentries.org/instructors
 - some concern about "yet another place to keep stuff up to date"
 
 - 
(ED) document strategies for reproducible environments using conda-forge
 - 
(UK) Static libraries stuff
- Add linting hints to builds to find them
 - Recommend how to package them -> CFEP-18
 - We should write docs saying we don't provide support and this is a bad idea. -> CFEP-18